Question #02 comes to us tonight after I’ve already polled my Bible Study guys that are fathers and am still in need of other opinions.

When I was a child (not too long ago, I know) we had specific names for the two forms of “toilet use”.

#1 was “tinkle”
#2 was “yucks”

(and you wonder why I have to grow a beard?)

My question is this – as a soon-to-be Father, what are the pro’s and con’s and OPTIONS therein of naming “toilet talk” certain nouns?

Everyone knows it’s pee or poop – so why the “polite” words?

Did you use “polite” words as a child? Did you teach YOUR children “polite words”?

Does it differ between boys and girls?

I’m very curious about this one – and can’t wait to read your responses.

What a find!

10.24.2005 — 8 Comments



I haven’t a clue when this photo was taken (considering the glasses I’m thinking age 11 or 12?), but Dad just uncovered it in the garage and after a quick scan, sent it my way with the “I hope this pictures shows up on your website.” sentence.

Kind of fitting considering yesterday’s post, don’t you think?

Let the world-wide-web laughter commence.

interesting, isn’t it?

Dear stevansheets.com “readership”,

Seriously, I want to grow a beard.

I’m twenty-six and I’ve never had more than a few squirrely-hairs growing from my chin in a not-so-attractive manner.

Manly = provider, protector, and “one who can grow beard”.

Manly is also something that one has to be to be a father. Especially a father to a son – who is also of the male gender (in case you didn’t know) I can think of nothing worse for me than for my future son (or daughter) to question my “manly-ness” by questioning my ability (or lack of) to grow man-hair on my face.

To be manly, therefore, means that I need to grow a beard, right?

Right.

So, as of Thursday morning this week, I have set down the daily or bi-daily chore of shaving what miniscule day or two-day old hair has grown on my man-face.

I felt disgusting this morning going to church with face-stub, but manly nonetheless.

I have asked the permission of my wife and she has sheepishly agreed that for the next two weeks I will FINALLY have the opportunity to attempt man-hair on my face. Yummy.

Expect photos. (unless of course this experiment fails horribly.)

The reason I can attempt this NOW is that we are leaving this week for a quick “vacation” to PA and will miss our services here on next Sunday morning.

It’s been indelibly marked on my brain that “proper” young men DO NOT come to church with partial man-hair growing on their faces (thus today’s “disgusting” adjective use).

You, faithful stevansheets.com visitors/readers/stalkers, have the privilege over the next two weeks to enjoy this man-hair experiment with yours truly. I can think of nothing more exciting for you to be involved with.

Cheer me on, if you would. (and pray for Jess)

Wanting to be manly,

-Stevan

Chicago White Sox

10.22.2005 — 2 Comments

I don’t know which is more interesting –

#1 – the White Sox have won game 1 of the 2005 World Series versus the Houston Astros.

or

#2 – tonight’s White Sox pitcher, Bobby Jenks is 2 years younger than me.

I’m going with #2, I think.